CricketWise
  1. Home
  2. Players
  3. Adam Lyth
  4. vs Simon Harmer

Batter vs bowler · all formats

Adam Lyth vs Simon Harmer: head to head record

Data through 29 June 2025Last updated 29 June 2025

In 8 matches between 2017 and 2025, Adam Lyth scored 129 runs off 394 balls from Simon Harmer (strike rate 32.7). Simon Harmer dismissed Adam Lyth 0 times. 85% of the balls were dot balls, and Adam Lyth hit 16 fours and 3 sixes.

Balls
394
8 matches
Runs
129
Dismissals
0
by Simon Harmer
Strike rate
32.7
Dot balls
85%
Average
–
runs per dismissal

By format

Adam Lyth batting against Simon Harmer
FormatMatchesBallsRunsOutsSR
first-class8394129032.7

By year

010020030020172019202523065
Adam Lyth vs Simon Harmer: runs and balls per year
01002003002017201820192022202523065
Adam Lyth vs Simon Harmer: runs and balls per year
Show as table
Adam Lyth vs Simon Harmer: runs and balls per year
YearRunsBalls
20171612
201844
201943146
202212
202565230

Every meeting

Most recent first
DateFormatCompetitionRunsBallsDismissedGround
29 Jun 2025MDMCounty Championship1085–York Cricket Club
9 May 2025MDMCounty Championship55145–County Ground, Chelmsford
5 May 2022MDMCounty Championship12–County Ground, Chelmsford
7 Jul 2019MDMCounty Championship011–County Ground, Chelmsford
3 Jun 2019MDMCounty Championship43135–Headingley
4 May 2018MDMCounty Championship44–County Ground, Chelmsford
25 Sep 2017MDMCounty Championship104–County Ground, Chelmsford
6 Aug 2017MDMCounty Championship68–North Marine Road Ground

Frequently asked questions

How many times has Simon Harmer dismissed Adam Lyth?
0 times in 8 matches in the data (2017–2025).
What is Adam Lyth's strike rate against Simon Harmer?
32.7: 129 runs off 394 balls.
How many runs has Adam Lyth scored against Simon Harmer?
129 runs, with 16 fours and 3 sixes.

Player pages

Balls faced exclude wides. Dismissals count only wickets credited to the bowler (not run outs). Coverage: Cricsheet data only.

Source: computed by CricketWise from Cricsheet ball-by-ball data (ODC-BY). Definitions: methodology.